gareth.peters
My feedback
30 results found
-
6 votesgareth.peters
shared this idea
·
-
1 votegareth.peters
shared this idea
·
-
22 votes
Your feature suggestion is now live on the user community and available for voting. Remember to share with your colleagues for support!
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
Hi Meghan
Thanks for your suggestion.
There’s a similar suggestion already on the community so I’ll move this to voting and merge them together.
Thanks
Rossgareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Amazing news!
We are delighted to say that this feature has now rolled into Closed Beta with a limited group of users.
We'll provide more updates on general release as soon as we have them🚀
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
🚀 Your feature suggestion is live! Now it’s time to rally support—share it with your colleagues and get those votes in.
💡 "An idea can turn to dust or magic, depending on the talent that rubs against it." Let’s make yours magic. The more votes your Firefish feature suggestion gets, the better its chances of making it onto our roadmap.
Start sharing and make an impact! 🔥
Firefish Product Team🐠.
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment gareth.peters
commented
Being able to see selected mandatory compliance for any candidates working for the client, is obviously a huge selling point. Unfortunately, once you share compliance, you also share all the candidate's personal information and even their bank details, which is something we cannot justify and would be a breach of GDPR. The ability to share only the compliance record and to restrict everything else, would therefore be essential for us!
-
1 votegareth.peters
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment gareth.peters
commented
In a temp market dealing with 24 hour provision, it is extremely difficult to use the availability as it is currently, to indicate that a person is available next Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, but ONLY for a night shift. At the moment, a mandatory rest period of 9 hours is added onto any unavailability status, so this only adds to the confusion. Speed is of the essence in the temp market, and we need to be able to check availability quickly and ensure candidates can only be booked into the exact shifts they are looking for. If we cannot remove the mandatory rest period then updating someone's availability becomes so complicated that it is simply unworkable. The unavailable status should be considered as rest quite simply. Only an actual booking should include a mandatory rest period.
gareth.peters
shared this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment gareth.peters
commented
Thank you for raising this on my behalf. But further to the above, if we could set the time parameters ourselves it would be ideal. Rather than Morning, we would want Early, for example, and the hours would actually be more like 6:30-14:30 to match the basic Health Board shift types and patterns.
gareth.peters
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesgareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
🚀 Your feature suggestion is live! Now it’s time to rally support—share it with your colleagues and get those votes in.
💡 "An idea can turn to dust or magic, depending on the talent that rubs against it." Let’s make yours magic. The more votes your Firefish feature suggestion gets, the better its chances of making it onto our roadmap.
Start sharing and make an impact! 🔥
Firefish Product Team🐠.
An error occurred while saving the comment gareth.peters
commented
This really is essential for us and does need to be comprehensive so that you would be prevented even from sending their CV/Profile to that client in the future. It may not be such an issue for perm recruiters, but in the temp market it's a must have.
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesgareth.peters
shared this idea
·
-
22 votesgareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment gareth.peters
commented
The ability to edit the layout of the candidate portal and to be able to group certain requirements in this way under headers, would be of huge benefit.
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesgareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Hi Jo,
Your feature suggestion is now live on the user community and available for voting. Remember to share with your colleagues for support!
Thanks,
Catherine
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Your feature suggestion is now live on the user community and available for voting. Remember to share with your colleagues for support!
Thanks,
Catherine
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesgareth.peters
shared this idea
·
-
42 votes
Hi Liam
Thanks for posting. This idea is now Open for Voting.
Thanks
Ross
An error occurred while saving the comment gareth.peters
commented
I am struggling with the best way to do this when establishing the compliance process. This would resolve a huge headache. A similar solution with regard to DBS documentation, and professional registers - like the EWC and NMC - would also be fantastic. The compliance in Education, and even more so in Healthcare, is so complex that any automations like this would have a huge impact.
gareth.peters
supported this idea
·
This is vital for us and would save us a lot of time. I am also really keen to know when the Availability tab is going to integrated with matching? I realise it is Beta still, but if a candidate's availability doesn't match the shift then they shouldn't match against it.